The second trial day in the federal challenge to California's Proposition 8 featured two professors giving expert testimony on behalf of the same-sex plaintiffs. The Yes on 8 campaign used a similar cross-examination strategy for both experts: attempting to discredit their scholarship by laying bare their policy preferences.
January 13, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
George Chauncey — a Yale-educated professor now on the faculty in New Haven, Conn., a published author with a calm demeanor — makes for a compelling expert witness.
So after testimony for the better part of an afternoon about discrimination gays and lesbians have faced, lawyers defending a ban on gay marriage took a very direct tactic.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
