For a long time, videoconferencing was like a bad blind date. Everything seemed great on paper, but in person — well, the polite word was “disappointment.” Put aside issues of cost (high), technical complexity (lots), and user-friendliness (none), the pictures just looked bad: all fuzzy and jittery. And because video taxed a network a lot more than data did, even the specialized, expensive phone lines firms used for videoconferences couldn’t keep up. The result: annoying delays in the conversation. In theory, videoconferencing was a great way to do business — no travel hassle or costs. In practice, it was a pretty lousy one.

But videoconferencing has evolved, and just in time, because the world has changed in ways that make it critical to do as much work as possible without getting on an airplane. Concerns about terrorism and the economy — not to mention clients keeping an increasingly sharp eye on expenses — have put an end to the glory days of unrestricted air travel. But with competition for clients more heated than ever, firms’ need for face-to-face meetings has increased. So has their appetite for communications tools that aren’t just cheaper than traveling, but that come close to replicating the in-person experience.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]