Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In a ruling sure to cause a buzz among financial regulators, a federal judge has publicly disagreed with the policy of the Securities and Exchange Commission in how it treats investors in Ponzi schemes who were lucky enough to get their money back before the scheme collapsed.

As U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond sees it, the policies of the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are potentially unfair to later investors whose funds are typically used to pay back principal — and provide the false “profits” — to the early investors.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.