In a ruling sure to cause a buzz among financial regulators, a federal judge has publicly disagreed with the policy of the Securities and Exchange Commission in how it treats investors in Ponzi schemes who were lucky enough to get their money back before the scheme collapsed.

As U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond sees it, the policies of the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are potentially unfair to later investors whose funds are typically used to pay back principal — and provide the false “profits” — to the early investors.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]