In a stinging 13-page dissent, a Manhattan appeals judge has criticized a decision to cut almost in half the 16-to-32-year prison sentence a defendant received for masterminding an elaborate, multi-million-dollar diamond scam.

Justice Peter Tom of New York’s Appellate Division, 1st Department, wrote that the majority’s leniency was misplaced, considering the potential damage the defendant wreaked on the culture of trust in the diamond industry, where million-dollar deals are secured by only a handshake.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]