There’s an old saying in journalism that three examples make a trend. Under those rules, we can now declare a trend in IP litigation. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled Wednesday that the chief judge of the Eastern District of Texas abused his discretion in refusing to transfer Novartis’ patent infringement case (pdf) against Hoffmann-La Roche out of his jurisdiction. This is the third time since the 5th Circuit’s October 2008 en banc ruling in In re Volkswagen that the Federal Circuit has granted a writ of mandamus and booted a patent case out of Texas. (The other two were In re TS Tech (pdf) and In re Genentech (pdf).)

Novartis, represented by Morrison & Foerster and McKool Smith, had argued that it was perfectly sensible for its infringement suit to be based in Texas, even though Novartis is a California-based company; Roche is a Swiss company with U.S. operations headquartered in New Jersey; and the drug at issue, Fuzeon, was developed in North Carolina, manufactured primarily in Colorado, and sold nationwide. Novartis’ reasoning? Texas was a central location where thousands of documents have already been electronically transferred, and one non-party witness lived in the state and was subject to subpoena there.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]