The Central Intelligence Agency's refusal to allow Valerie Plame Wilson to disclose her possible pre-2002 status as a covert agent does not violate the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday. Wilson's resignation from the CIA became effective in January 2006, three years after columnist Robert Novak reported her status as an "agency operative on weapons of mass destruction." When the CIA later tried to redact parts of Plame?s 2007 memoir, she and her publisher, Simon & Schuster Inc., sued.
November 12, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Central Intelligence Agency’s refusal to allow Valerie Plame Wilson to disclose her possible pre-2002 status as a covert agent does not violate the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.
Wilson’s resignation from the CIA became effective in January 2006, three years after columnist Robert Novak reported her status as a “agency operative on weapons of mass destruction.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
