It’s a rarely used, dusty corner of the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. And on Monday the Court decided to leave it undisturbed, rejecting a request by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to resolve a question that could affect prosecution of long-ago civil rights cases in the South.

Under federal law dating back to 1802, one way to get a case before the Supreme Court is for a federal appeals court to certify the question it raises — in other words, asking the justices to decide the question and instruct it on what to do. It has never been a frequently traveled path to the Supreme Court, but it has been allowed from time to time — though not since 1981. In a 1957 case, the Court suggested the appeals courts should resolve knotty questions themselves without certifying a question, except in “rare instances.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]