Stanford spent a lot of time pursuing a patent case against Roche for its HIV test kits. Unfortunately for the university, it’s also spent a lot of time losing.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Stanford didn’t have standing to sue because it didn’t own all the patent rights and ordered the case dismissed. The appellate court undid 2008 rulings by Northern District of California Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. Patel had previously disposed of the case in a different way, ruling that the patents were invalid — showing that as with cat-skinning, there is more than one way to lose a patent case.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]