X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A Manhattan appeals panel has upheld the dismissal of fraud and legal malpractice claims brought against a prominent Manhattan litigator, his current firm and two others where he had worked.

However, the Appellate Division, 1st Department, disputed the lower court’s holding that a malpractice claim against one of his former firms was time-barred. Instead, it ruled that the statute of limitations was tolled while the attorney had continued to represent the plaintiff in the same matter, even though he had moved to a different law firm. The case is Waggoner v. Caruso, 2009 NY Slip Op 06739.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.