The New York Court of Appeals on Thursday affirmed a lower court's holding that a lawyer should not be allowed to foreclose on a condo he said he bought for his girlfriend before she discovered he was married to another woman. The court noted the "highly unusual circumstances of this case" and the outstanding questions over whether the $285,300 used to buy the condo was a loan or a gift.
September 21, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The New York Court of Appeals Thursday affirmed an Appellate Division, 1st Department, holding that a lawyer should not be allowed to foreclose on a condo he said he bought for his girlfriend/future wife before she discovered he was married to another woman.
In an unsigned memorandum ruling, the court unanimously also said Radiah K. Givens had stated a prima facie case of fraudulent inducement to marriage against Joseph I. Rosenzweig.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
