The New Jersey Supreme Court at a hearing on Tuesday appeared sympathetic to a municipal court judge who faces ethics sanctions because his law partner made political contributions without his knowledge or consent. Philip Boggia’s partner donated $2,200, using the firm’s business account, after his January 2004 appointment as Moonachie, N.J.’s part-time judge, despite Boggia having told the partner and firm employees at that time that such contributions would no longer be allowed.

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct has nonetheless recommended an admonition, not on a theory of vicarious liability or on the law of partnership but rather on the “undeniable appearance” that Boggia shared responsibility for the contributions, which is all that is needed to violate the Code of Judicial Conduct’s prohibition of political contributions by judges, Canon 7A(4).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]