A man’s purchase of two beers for his wife at a party the night she was run over by a sheriff’s deputy’s patrol car did not necessarily constitute “guilty participation” in her intoxication that precludes his recovery of damages under the state’s Dram Shop Act, an appeals court has decided.

A 4-1 panel of the Appellate Division, 4th Department, ruled that while the Dram Shop Act prohibits an intoxicated person or their estates from maintaining a cause of action for injuries they sustained from their intoxication, the law allows survivors to sue individually.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]