Aggressive lawyering at two of New Jersey's high-profile litigation firms is under attack in cases the state Supreme Court has added to its agenda for the new term. A case in which Sills Cummis & Gross is facing sanctions and disqualification gives the court an opportunity to make significant refinements in the law governing companies' control over employees' electronic communications. At issue in a case against Bruce Nagel of Nagel Rice is whether he or his client should pay a frivolous pleading fee award.
August 31, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Aggressive lawyering at two of New Jersey’s high-profile litigation firms — Sills Cummis & Gross and Nagel Rice — is under attack in cases the state Supreme Court has added to its agenda for the term that begins Sept. 14.
A case in which Sills Cummis of Newark, N.J., is facing sanctions and disqualification gives the court an opportunity to make significant refinements in the law governing companies’ control over employees’ electronic communications.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
