A private equity fund manager has no personal claim of legal malpractice against Pepper Hamilton because he ignored the firm’s legal advice and should have known the firm was representing the fund and not him individually, a Philadelphia judge said.

In his opinion to the Superior Court in the appeal of Behr v. Imhoff, Common Pleas Court Judge Albert W. Sheppard Jr. asked the Superior Court to uphold his decision to grant Pepper Hamilton summary judgment against Philip H. Behr’s claims of malpractice. The same should go for his favorable ruling after a bench trial for defendants and fund managers W. Joseph Imhoff and Bernard B. Markey, Sheppard said in his opinion last month.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]