Lawyers for Michael Duxbury, a one-time regional sales manager for the blockbuster anemia drug Procrit, estimate that his False Claims Act case against the Johnson & Johnson Ortho Biotech Products subsidiary is worth at least $3 billion, and possibly as much as $10 billion. What they can’t understand, say Jan Schlichtmann (of “A Civil Action” fame) and Paul Simmerly of Heman Recor Araki Kaufman Simmerly & Jackson, is why the federal government seems to want no part of Duxbury’s allegations that Ortho Biotech induced medical centers to file false claims for Medicare reimbursement by providing free samples of Procrit.

Last week a three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived Duxbury’s case, finding in a painstaking 47-page opinion (pdf) that Boston federal district court Judge Rya Zobel erred when she granted Ortho Biotech’s motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that Duxbury didn’t sufficiently plead his allegations. (The appellate panel affirmed Zobel’s dismissal of Duxbury’s false marketing claims and her finding that the claims of another whistleblower, Dean McClellan, were barred because he wasn’t an “original source” under the False Claims Act.) “We’re ecstatic,” Simmerly told The Am Law Litigation Daily. “We’re ready to go to trial.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]