The 9th Circuit came down on the side of Brayton Purcell in an Internet copyright infringement case Wednesday. The 50-lawyer personal injury and asbestos firm had sued another law firm for allegedly plagiarizing Web content describing its elder abuse practice. Dissenting Judge Stephen Reinhardt said that under the panel's interpretation, every Web site operator faces the potential of being hauled into "far-away courts based upon allegations of intellectual property infringement."
August 06, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals came down on the side of Novato, Calif., personal injury firm Brayton Purcell in an Internet copyright infringement case Wednesday.
The 50-lawyer personal injury and asbestos firm had sued two-lawyer San Diego-based Recordon & Recordon for allegedly plagiarizing Web content describing its elder abuse practice. Brayton Purcell copyrighted its Web site in October 2002.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
