Last month, The Am Law Daily reported that Huron Consulting Group had filed an intriguing lawsuit against Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal in state trial court in Chicago, accusing the firm of illegally recruiting several Huron employees to start its own competing health care consulting group. The suit (filed by Steptoe & Johnson) also accused five ex-Huron staffers, now all at Sonnenschein, of violating non-compete and non-solicitation agreements that banned them from leaving Huron and recruiting Huron employees and clients.

Flash forward a month, and it’s Huron on the defensive. First, Sonnenschein and its attorneys at Schiff Hardin recently filed a 94-page response to the Huron suit, essentially denying every major plank of the complaint — including the from the Huron employees who jumped to Sonnenschein allegedly characterizing the firm as a cash cow willing to fork over whatever salary they requested. (According to the court papers, one ex-Huron defendant allegedly told a friend that Sonnenschein “didn’t blink” when presented with outrageous salary demands.)

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]