A tangled case stemming from what the plaintiff's attorney called an insurance agency's "simple failure to send a fax or e-mail" has cost the agency, along with the insurance company whose policy it sold, more than $1 million, including $400,000 in attorney fees. An attorney for Pacific Insurance Co. said it will appeal the $881,000 portion of the judgment it was ordered to pay to the plaintiff, Regency Savings Bank.
August 04, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A tangled case stemming from what the plaintiff’s attorney called a “simple failure to send a fax or e-mail” by an insurance agency has cost the agency, along with the insurance company whose policy it sold, more than $1 million, including $400,000 in attorney fees.
An attorney for Pacific Insurance Co. said it will appeal the $881,000 portion of the judgment it was ordered to pay to the plaintiff, Regency Savings Bank.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
