A federal judge has certified a class action consumer antitrust suit against retail giant Babies “R” Us and a group of manufacturers of popular baby products after concluding that a price-fixing conspiracy could be proven entirely through “common evidence.”

Legally, the 50-page opinion by U.S. District Judge Anita B. Brody in McDonough v. Toys “R” Us Inc. is important because it clarifies the scope and effect of two recent decisions from higher courts — one from the U.S. Supreme Court and one from the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — that altered the pleading standards for price-fixing cases and made the test for winning class certification a more rigorous one.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]