The “expectation of privacy” has been a touchstone of privacy law since U.S. Supreme Court Justice John M. Harlan first enunciated the phrase four decades ago.[FOOTNOTE 1] But applying that characterization has proved difficult. One focus of privacy has been the notion that a man’s home is his castle. But how far beyond the home should the expectation extend? And applying the characterization to advancing technology has proved especially troubling.

Consider an advance that permits easy, inexpensive and comprehensive gathering of information that previously was lawfully collectible, but only with a great expenditure of resources. Should a quantum jump in the ease, inexpensiveness and magnitude of collection alter the expectation? The New York Court of Appeals recently grappled with these issues in People v. Weaver, a 4-3 decision handed down on May 12.[FOOTNOTE 2]

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]