The National Geographic Society is challenging a Florida photographer’s U.S. Supreme Court petition for review, which, if granted, could revisit the high court’s 2001 landmark copyright ruling that said publishers can’t sell previously published freelance contributions for use in computer or online databases without renegotiating publication rights with the authors.

Written by former Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, the National Geographic brief argues that there is no reason for the Supreme Court to hear Florida photographer Jerry Greenberg’s appeal of an 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ en banc ruling favoring National Geographic that was handed down last summer. That ruling, released by a sharply divided court, addressed conflicting appellate interpretations of New York Times v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483, and the 1976 revisions of federal copyright laws.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]