In a case of first impression, a New Jersey judge has ruled that a plaintiff can compel the videotaping of her own deposition, even if the deposing party opposes it. Superior Court Judge Rachelle Harz wrote that a plaintiff-driven recording does not run afoul of the state court rule governing videotaped depositions and that any party may videotape a deposition. She added that videotaping "has become an acceptable method of creating a deposition record and is widely embraced by the legal profession."
August 21, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
In a case of first impression, a Bergen County, N.J., judge has ruled that a plaintiff can compel the videotaping of her own deposition, even if the deposing party opposes it.
Superior Court Judge Rachelle Harz wrote that a plaintiff-driven recording does not run afoul of the court rule governing videotaped depositions and that any party may videotape a deposition.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
