Refereeing a discovery dispute between King & Spalding and Duane Morris, a federal judge said the only way he'd sort out the problem was by combing the record himself, adding, "And then, I am going to be really mad at somebody." That somebody turned out to be King & Spalding, which had said Duane Morris couldn't be trusted and had made "plainly false" statements to the court. The judge said that King & Spalding's claims "are just not true" and that the "invective" by K&S could cost the firm or its client.
August 19, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Refereeing a discovery dispute between lawyers from King & Spalding and Duane Morris, a federal judge said the only way he’d ever sort out the problem was by combing through the record himself.
“And then,” he added, according to a hearing transcript, “I am going to be really mad at somebody.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
