Cablevision's proposed remote storage digital video recorder system does not violate the Copyright Act, a federal appeals court ruled Monday. The 2nd Circuit overturned a grant of summary judgment to film and TV producers who claimed Cablevision's system would directly infringe their copyrights by making unauthorized reproductions and by engaging in public performances. The length of time that data resided in system buffers was a key issue for the circuit in finding that copying had not occurred.
August 05, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Cablevision’s proposed remote storage digital video recorder system does not violate the Copyright Act, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a grant of summary judgment to film and TV producers who claimed Cablevision’s system would directly infringe their copyrights by making unauthorized reproductions and by engaging in public performances.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
