In a major victory for the business community, a California appeal court ruled on July 22 that employers are only required to provide meal and rest breaks for their workers, not ensure they're taken. The 53-page ruling by San Diego's Fourth District Court of Appeal also said employers can't be held liable for working employees off the clock unless they knew they were doing so.
July 23, 2008 at 05:25 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
In a major victory for the business community, a California appeal court ruled on July 22 that employers are only required to provide meal and rest breaks for their workers, not ensure they’re taken.
The 53-page ruling by San Diego’s Fourth District Court of Appeal also said employers can’t be held liable for working employees off the clock unless they knew they were doing so.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
