The maker of Splenda, the nation’s best-selling sugar substitute, has won an injunction that bars the manufacturer of a generic version of its product from continuing to distribute store-brand products that mimic Splenda’s packaging.

In his 27-page opinion in McNeil Nutritionals v. Heartland Sweeteners, U.S. District Judge John R. Padova rejected the argument that Splenda’s trade dress uses elements so common in the sweetener market that it cannot be inherently distinctive.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]