A Nassau County, N.Y., judge has granted a divorce after rewriting what he called “absurd” statutory language aimed at alerting parties to the loss of health insurance.

Attorneys familiar with the case say it’s an example of the judiciary effectively preserving the spirit, if not following the letter, of a statute that has caused delays in thousands of cases as courts are forced to track down information on the health insurance status of divorcing parties.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]