A divorcing New York couple's agreement regarding their children's college expenses is valid even though its basic child-support provisions are invalid under federal law, a New York state appellate panel has ruled. At the center of the Appellate Division, 2nd Department's ruling was the finding that the stipulation's college expenses provision was separate and apart from the provisions that must be vacated under the Child Support Standards Act.
June 25, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A divorcing Westchester, N.Y., couple’s agreement regarding their children’s college expenses is valid even though its basic child-support provisions are invalid under federal law, a New York state appellate panel has ruled.
At the center of the Appellate Division, 2nd Department’s ruling was the finding that the stipulation’s college-expenses provision was separate and apart from the provisions that must be vacated under the Child Support Standards Act.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
