Deepening insolvency is not an independent cause of action unless a plaintiff alleges other causes of action such as professional negligence, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in a claim by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department against accounting firm Deloitte & Touche.

The court issued an unpublished opinion authored by Senior Judge James Gardner Colins in Ario v. Deloitte & Touche denying in part the firm’s motion for summary judgment based on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ 2006 decision in In re CitX Corp., where the federal court ruled deepening insolvency is not a valid theory of damages for an independent cause of action.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]