Despite two solid victories for workers in job bias cases in the Roberts Court recently and what some consider “surprising” votes by the two newest justices in those cases, plaintiffs’ and management attorneys hesitate to predict a significant shift away from the U.S. Supreme Court’s generally pro-employer stance of recent years.
But what is significant and evident from the decisions on May 27 is that all but two of the justices now accept that protection from retaliation for making a discrimination claim — even if not mentioned in the text of a statute — is encompassed by the express right in federal civil rights laws to be free from discrimination. CBOCS West v. Humphries, No. 06-1431; Gomez-Perez v. Potter, No. 06-1321.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]