A federal judge has refused to dismiss a pair of antitrust suits that accuse retail giant Babies R Us of conspiring with a group of manufacturers of “high-end” baby products to set minimum resale prices in order to squelch competition from Internet retailers.

The first suit was filed by two Internet retailers — BabyAge and BabyClub — which claim they were successfully competing with Babies R Us by undercutting its prices, but that their efforts to gain a foothold in the market were thwarted when Babies R Us persuaded the manufacturers to insist on minimum retail prices.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]