Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
NEW YORK � A New York judge has given a boost to Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman by appointing the embattled law firm co-lead counsel in a consolidated suit over stock options backdating. One of the nation’s leading securities plaintiff firms, Milberg Weiss’ ability to carry on with client matters has been in question since the firm and two of its name partners � David Bershad and Steven Schulman � were indicted in May on charges they paid illegal kickbacks to class action plaintiffs. All pleaded not guilty last week in Los Angeles federal court. But Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Richard Lowe said in a decision dated July 13 that the firm’s indictment had no bearing on its ability to handle a batch of derivative suits on behalf of individual investors in voicemail software company Comverse Technology Inc., whose top executives allegedly enriched themselves by almost $400 million by repricing stock option grants. The judge said the primary consideration was that none of the individual investors objected to the consolidation of their suits with Milberg Weiss serving as co-counsel with Schiffrin & Barroway of Radnor, Pa. “Moreover, none of the attorneys here for Milberg Weiss have been indicted or have been accused of any wrongdoing,” Justice Lowe wrote in a footnote in Sollins v. Alexander, 601272/06. “Finally, the court stresses that unless and until Milberg Weiss is found guilty for the actions upon which it has been indicted, the presumption of innocence is binding here.” The decision will be published Friday. The partner leading the case for Milberg Weiss is Benjamin Kaufman. Justice Lowe consolidated under the control of Milberg Weiss and Schiffrin & Barroway several state court actions that had been filed over the Comverse stock options. A number of federal suits have also been filed in the Eastern District. The appointment in the high-profile Comverse backdating scandal would have been barely noteworthy for Milberg Weiss in the past, but since its indictment a number of judges around the country have questioned whether the firm should be awarded lead counsel status in upcoming matters. Senior partner Melvyn Weiss Monday hailed Justice Lowe’s decision as a “ray of sunshine.” “This court has made a statement that the presumption of innocence is binding,” said Weiss. “It’s amazing to me that judges all over America aren’t saying this.” Objections to Milberg Weiss serving as lead counsel in the Comverse case had been led by rival plaintiff firms Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo, who were representing the Louisiana School Employee’s Retirement System in a bid for lead plaintiff status. Berman DeValerio has offices in Boston, San Francisco and West Palm Beach. Though Justice Lowe agreed that those two firms were also well qualified to lead the suit, he said he was lending considerable weight to the fact that Milberg Weiss’ client had been first, in April 2006, to file suit over the backdating issue, less than a month after Comverse’s board of directors announced it was investigating options grants. But Justice Lowe also said in his footnote it was “disingenuous” for Bernstein Litowitz to raise the issue of Milberg Weiss’ indictment and its impact on the Comverse matter “since the attorney representing LSERS was himself a partner at Milberg Weiss, a member of its Management Committee, and was at Milberg Weiss when this action was commenced.” The judge was referring to Salvatore Graziano, who announced plans to leave Milberg Weiss in March. LEAD POSITION Bernstein Litowitz’s John Coffey said yesterday the judge’s decision to award lead counsel status to the first plaintiff to file was not an unusual one. “That’s the way it works sometimes,” he said. But Coffey took issue with the judge’s “gratuitous” footnote concerning Graziano. He said the ex-Milberg Weiss partner had been minimally involved with his old firm’s suit and had withdrawn from representing LSERS early on, handing the case off to Gerald Silk of Bernstein Litowitz. “The idea that he was somehow involved in this case is incorrect,” said Coffey. Bernstein Litowitz has been widely touted as the firm most likely to take the mantle of top securities class action firm in the wake of Milberg Weiss’ indictment. Weiss yesterday clearly took some pleasure in edging out a rival that had argued Milberg Weiss was unable to devote the necessary resources to the Comverse matter. “I think we’re still bigger than Bernstein Litowitz” he said. If so, Bernstein Litowitz is about to narrow the gap by one. Coffey said Milberg Weiss partner William Fredericks will be joining Bernstein Litowitz in September. A partner at Milberg Weiss for the past seven years who also previously worked as an associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and Willkie Farr & Gallagher, Fredericks is a veteran of several major securities class actions. Anthony Lin is a reporter with the New York Law Journal, a Recorder affiliate.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.