The Washington Supreme Court reinstated a woman’s conviction for criminal solicitation, finding the phrase “money or other thing of value” under state law does not refer exclusively to monetary value.

In a matter of first impression, the court considered the statutory interpretation issue of whether the meaning of “other thing of value” as used in RCW 9A.28.030(1) was limited to “thing[s]” reducible to monetary value.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]