Partners Are Frustrated With 'Zoom Associates': The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 29, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
YOUTH GONE WILD? - Some law firm partners are increasingly frustrated with the quality of work and the attitudes of "Zoom associates"—those who came into firms during and since the pandemic—according to a new report by Law.com's Patrick Smith, Andrew Maloney and Hank Grezlak. Consultants and partners have even bluntly described some younger associates as "lacking accountability and initiative." But has remote work actually led to laziness or has it simply put a new spin on the age-old trope of the older generation thinking the young'uns have it too easy? "Some of it is generational," said Michael Ferachi, managing member of Louisiana-based McGlinchey Stafford. "It's the 'we walked to school barefoot uphill for three miles and they need to, too.'" But what remote work and the entire experience of the pandemic does seem to have contributed to, according to firm leaders and industry watchers, is a lack of empathy. "It's made us all isolated…more frustrated with others," said Katten CEO Noah Heller. "It changed our tolerance for others…[People] are so focused on their own perspective."
FEARS OF INFLUENCE - The FTC recently issued new regulatory-compliance guidelines for the social media influencer market, a step it typically takes to put an industry on notice before it substantially ramps up enforcement actions. And, as Law.com's Trudy Knockless reports, in-house lawyers whose companies work with influencers would do well to heed the warning. A Baker McKenzie client note said now is the time for companies to review their use of influencers, the processes they have in place for monitoring them, and how their influencers disclose their relationships to products and services. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, told Knockless that undertaking is "a lot of work because there are a lot of [influencers] out there and their connection to your company can be very, frankly, vague at best. So the in-house counsel has to pay attention to it, be careful about it."
ON THE RADAR - MidCountry Bank was slapped with a consumer class action on Aug. 24 in Minnesota 4th Judicial District for Hennepin County. The lawsuit alleges the defendant wrongfully charges overdraft fees for debit card users' "authorize positive, settle negative" transactions. The suit brings breach-of-contract, unjust enrichment and Consumer Fraud Act claims. The suit was filed by Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Gibbs Law Group, Cohen & Malad and Stranch Jennings & Garvey. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 27-CV-23-13384, Scarlett Rusch vs Midcountry Bank. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Federal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
Trump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-70
- 2Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Standing for Plaintiffs in Copyright Suit Over AI Training of ChatGPT
- 3LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 4NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 5ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250