U.S. Federal Courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts. Credit: Jay Yuan/Shutterstock.com Judge Determines New York, Not Massachusetts, Law Applies to Patient's Suit Against Research Institute
"This case simply does not present the sort of unusual and 'fortuitous' circumstances that the Restatement provides might justify deviating from the location of the injury," the court wrote.
May 31, 2023 at 04:18 PM
7 minute read
Civil Procedure
A federal judge in Massachusetts granted a New York woman's cross-motion for partial summary judgment, after determining New York, not Massachusetts, law applied to her claims against Schepens Eye Research Institute.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
