The California Supreme Court did not tip its hand in remote oral arguments Tuesday in a highly watched case that will shape the future of Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) litigation.

Justices asked limited questions of the veteran appellate counsel representing both sides in Adolph v. Uber Technologies Inc., a worker classification suit brought under the controversial California law that allows an employee to “stand in the shoes” of the state to enforce labor laws in civil actions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]