Making both statutory and equal-rights arguments, two separate lawyers, including one from the ACLU, argued before Michigan’s high court that an unwed former same-sex partner should qualify as a legal “parent” to a child her and her former partner agreed to have, via in vitro fertilization, but that one partner is no longer allowed to see.

The attorneys were opposed by the lawyer for the woman who carried and gave birth to the child, making her the sole member of the former couple to have a genetic link to the child since the IVF procedure involved using sperm donated by a man who gave up parental rights as part of the IVF process.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]