For a third time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has held that a public employee’s First Amendment rights are not infringed when a public employer authorizes a union to serve as the exclusive representative in collective bargaining for employees within that unit.

In the present case, three-judge appellate panel considered an appeal involving a lawsuit filed by Richard J. Peltz-Steele, the chancellor professor at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth School of Law, who claimed that he was compelled against his will to accept the UMass Faculty Federation, Local 1895, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, as well as his exclusive collective bargaining representative for terms and conditions of his employment. The law professor has declined to join the union or have the union serve as his “‘exclusive bargaining representative.’”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]