Billable Hours Remain a Barrier to Law Firms Embracing AI: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 07, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
FIRM FRUGALITY - In this economy, everybody's having to sacrifice. For some, maybe that means forgoing takeout a couple nights a week. For law firm partners, it might be mean forgoing that transcontinental flight to visit a client who wishes they would have stayed home anyway. "Law firms can't control the economy. But they can control their expenses," Joe Mendola, senior director of sales for the Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group, told Law.com's Andrew Maloney. "In a slow economic environment, you do expect firms to drill down and focus more on managing their expense growth." Really, that drilling has already commenced. While surging expenses have kept law firm leaders up at night lately, costs in the legal industry actually went down "sharply" by the end of the year, Wells Fargo analysts found, and they expect the trend to continue in 2023.
YOU DOWN WITH GPT? - Over the past few weeks, there's been a growing trickle of legal tech providers leveraging GPT-3.5—a large language model that one can think of as the AI engine powering ChatGPT—in their products and services. But don't expect many law firms—some of whom have become legal tech developers themselves—to follow suit anytime soon. For most firms, the expertise needed to develop GPT 3.5 tools is still a bridge too. That's not the only barrier to entry, however. As Law.com's Rhys Dipshan reports, this new tech once again presents law firms with an age-old problem: where's the value in becoming more efficient when your business model depends on billing a boatload of hours?
ON THE RADAR - Boeing was hit with a lawsuit Monday in Washington Western District Court claiming $83 million in damages due to the company's sale of 'non-airworthy' 737 MAX aircraft, which has been connected to two crashes resulting in over 300 fatalities. The 76-page complaint was brought by Shook, Hardy & Bacon on behalf of South African aviation company Comair Ltd. d/b/a British Airways and Kulula.com. Comair accuses Boeing of breaching an aircraft purchase agreement by concealing the 'catastrophic' and 'potentially fatal' defects of the aircraft. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:23-cv-00176, Comair Limited v. The Boeing Company et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
'What Are We Fixing?': ABA Rejects Proposal to Make Law School Admissions Tests Optional By Christine Charnosky and Allison Dunn |
2 Texas Firms Get $42M Patent Verdict Against Boston Scientific in Delaware By Adolfo Pesquera |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoes Your Corporate Compliance Program Reasonably Prevent Fraud? New UK Guidance Demands It
11 minute readKPMG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250