A state district court abused its discretion when it attempted to compel a judge to testify in a contempt of court proceeding, the Colorado Supreme Court unanimously held Dec. 19.

The state high court agreed with 21st Judicial District Judge Matthew D. Barrett’s motion to quash a subpoena compelling him to sit for a deposition in his judicial capacity. The panel said it was not convinced that Barrett possessed factual knowledge pertinent to the contempt charge against Tina Peters.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]