The Supreme Court’s intellectual property docket is going to start with a bang in the coming term, with the justices set to hear argument next month on a copyright fair-use case brought by the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts.

Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith picks up where last year’s Google v. Oracle left off, posing the question of what it means for a new work to be transformative, and how to balance that against the harm to the market for the creator’s original work and potential adaptations.

Roman Martinez Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]