In the matter of first impression, the Colorado Court of Appeals recently held that quantum meruit claims are legal claims, rather than equitable ones, and reinstated a $26 million jury award in favor of the plaintiffs after the trial court erroneously reduced the amount.

In a construction contract dispute, M.G. Dyess Inc. claimed that MarkWest Liberty Midstream & Resources materially hindered its work and delayed a project beyond contractual deadlines. Dyess asserted several claims, including quantum meruit, and sought to recover monetary damages for the market value of labor and materials it provided on the extracontractual basis, according to the appellate court’s opinion filed Sept. 15.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]