Happy Friday from Avalon and Brad, and welcome to another round-up of the week’s news about the judicial bench. This week, we took a closer look at a memorable dissent from a federal appeals court judge, and why one court watcher called it an example of “why diversity on the bench is so critical.” And Biden has only a few weeks left before midterms; what norms could he break to seat as many judges as possible before the Senate potentially flips? 

Please reach out to us via [email protected] or [email protected] with any tips or feedback. Follow us on Twitter: @AvalonZoppo and @BradKutner.

Judge James E. Graves Jr. Judge James E. Graves Jr. Photo by Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM

Judge’s Opinion Shows Impact of a Diverse Judiciary

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]