A criminal defendant’s submission to an unreliable polygraph test as part of a proffer agreement by the state does not constitute ineffective assistance, according to the Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

In a decision filed July 20, the court affirmed a post-conviction ruling by a PCR court, which determined that petitioner Theodore Willis’s trial counsel was not deficient and did not prejudice his defense. Willis had taken a “proffer agreement” offered by the state, using the advice of his trial attorney.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]