Who Got the Work?℠: Big Law Jumps Into Dispute Over 'Double Dare' Trademark and More
Welcome to "Who Got the Work?℠," a regular column that highlights the law firms and lawyers around the country who are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
July 12, 2022 at 02:55 PM
12 minute read
Dorsey offices in Washington, D.C. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Welcome to "Who Got the Work?℠," a regular column that highlights the law firms and lawyers around the country who are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
Consumer Class Action/Mass Tort Defense
Steptoe & Johnson partner Anthony G. Hopp has entered an appearance for CVS Health and CVS Pharmacy in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed May 18 in New York Western District Court by the Schlanger Law Group and the Wilshire Law Firm, contends that CVS-brand hand sanitizer does not eliminate 99% of all germs as the marketing implies. The defendants are also represented by Nixon Peabody. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford, is 6:22-cv-06227, Catholdi-Jankowski v. CVS Health Corporation et al. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar
Jenner & Block partner Elizabeth A. Edmondson and Squire Patton Boggs partner Adam R. Fox have stepped in as defense counsel for McDonald's and Wendy's, respectfully, in a false advertising class action. The suit, filed May 17 in New York Eastern District Court by James C. Kelly and other counsel, contends that the defendants cause their beef patties to appear 15 to 20 percent bigger in marketing images by not fully cooking them and loading them with extra toppings. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Hector Gonzalez, is 2:22-cv-02880, Chimienti v. Wendy's International LLC et al. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar
Attorneys from O'Melveny & Myers have stepped in to represent Apple in a pending consumer privacy class action. The action was filed May 16 in California Northern District Court by Bursor & Fisher on behalf of video renters who accuse Apple of storing their rental histories, credit card numbers and other personal information in violation of the New York Video Consumer Privacy Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., is 5:22-cv-02888, Baptiste v. Apple Inc. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
What Qualities Will Distinguish Good from Great Service In 2025?
Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute read
New Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
7 minute read
Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
- Paul Hastings
- Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co
- Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
- Wilshire Law Firm
- Steptoe & Johnson LLP
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Greenberg Traurig
- Shearman & Sterling LLP
- McCarthy Tetrault
- Perkins Coie
- Squire Patton Boggs
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Sidley Austin
- Stikeman Elliott
- Kindel & Anderson
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
- Littler Mendelson
- Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL
- Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
- Jones Day
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Warton & Garrison
- Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
- Nixon Peabody
- Milberg
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister
- Jenner & Block
- Latham & Watkins
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
- Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Morgan & Morgan
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
- Berger Montague
- Offit Kurman
- Potter Anderson & Corroon
- Sullivan & Worcester
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Cooley
- Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP
Trending Stories
- 1'Not the President's Personal Lawyer': Lawyers Share Concerns Over How AG Pick Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ
- 2US Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
- 3The Demise of Truth and Transparency in Federal Sentencing
- 4Former Phila. Solicitor Sozi Tulante Rejoins Dechert
- 5'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
