New Mexico attorney Alan Maestas was convicted of contempt, sentenced and fined after he refused to go forward with the defense of his client in a criminal trial. On Wednesday, a state appeals court affirmed the conviction but found that the trial court abused its discretion in handing down an “undeniably harsh” sentence.

According to the New Mexico Court of Appeals’ June 22 opinion, penned by Judge Megan P. Duffy, Maestas represented a criminal defendant in Union County District Court who was arrested and charged with criminal sexual penetration of a minor, child abuse resulting in great bodily harm, and enticement of a child. Maestas’ defense theory involved discrediting the interview methods employed to elicit the allegations made by the victim.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]