The Utah Court of Appeals sided with a restaurant on Thursday, finding that even if a trial court erred in adopting its proposed special verdict form, it wouldn’t be grounds for a new trial for the plaintiff, who was badly burned by the restaurant’s fire pit.
May 20, 2022 at 11:51 AM
6 minute read
The Utah Court of Appeals sided with a restaurant on Thursday, finding that even if a trial court erred in adopting its proposed special verdict form, it wouldn’t be grounds for a new trial for the plaintiff, who was badly burned by the restaurant’s fire pit.
The plaintiff, Emily Senkosky, sued the restaurant, Bistro 412 LLC, in the Third Judicial District Court under two theories of negligence: ordinary negligence and premises liability.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
