Justice Clarence Thomas on Wednesday became the focus of a congressional hearing that quickly devolved into competing partisan lists of which U.S. Supreme Court justices have ignored or violated ethical and recusal standards over the years.
The House Judiciary subcommittee on courts, intellectual property and the internet held the hearing on what it labeled “Building Confidence in the Supreme Court through Ethics and Recusal Reforms.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]