The Colorado Supreme Court this week sided with a man accused of harassing his ex-wife through posts on social media, upholding the district court’s finding that the phrase “intended to harass” in a portion of state law unconstitutionally restricts protected speech.

On Monday, the state high court affirmed the district court’s order that the provision in Colorado law Section 18-9-111, known as Kiana Arellano’s Law, is overbroad on its face, the Colorado Supreme Court’s opinion said. State lawmakers passed the law in 2015, two years following the 14-year-old girl’s attempted suicide after months of cyberbullying and teasing, according to the Weld County District Attorney’s Office.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]