"Under all of the circumstances, we think it better that the matter be heard before a different judge," the appeals panel wrote in remanding the matter.
March 28, 2022 at 05:15 PM
6 minute read
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court’s order to extend an attorney-plaintiff’s protective order against a defendant, finding she was denied a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
The case of Idris I. v. Hazel H.—which are pseudonyms for the parties—came before Cambridge District Court Judge Ina R. Howard-Hogan to decide if the abuse prevention order should be continued after a different judge issued the ex parte order in March 2021.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
